pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#70,908,617
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #70,908,617
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-04-27 17:24:18 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
13
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#70,908,617
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
updatePrices
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#6
0x69ef9c39
#7
setData
#8
0x39435dac
#9
0x69ef9c39
#5
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4
w0
5
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb45d9d6…cb85
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa4e3b3b1…0911
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc1259386…7f75
0xa6afd3…d132
3 touches
1 conflict
0x1680d0a9…2b37
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0001
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x1b68626d…2de19c
1 conflict on slot
0x0000000000…00001d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity