pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#70,999,574
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #70,999,574
26 transactions · 21 stateful · 2026-04-28 03:30:01 UTC
Parallelism
65
/100
Blocked
48
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.23
Longest chain
9
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#70,999,574
· 26 txs across 9 waves · depth 9
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
wave
w8
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 8
#9
multicall
#10
updatePrices
#11
0x69f02a30
#12
0xe7be4706
#13
0xe7be4706
#14
0x5bf9264c
#15
0x5bf9264c
#16
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#17
setData
#19
0x55e58ed0
#20
0xed82b078
#21
0x8b23406f
#22
0x39435dac
· blocks 1
#24
updatePrices
· blocks 1
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#23
0x39435dac
#25
updatePrices
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#7
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#18
0x6463ffd1
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w4
6
w5
7
w6
8
w7
18
w8
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xbff7cfb3…9e6d
0xd32edf…ff58
15 touches
28 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd5b10148…e637
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0xd32edf66…9fff58
28 conflicts on slot
0xbff7cfb3a5…f69e6d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity