pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#71,095,287
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #71,095,287
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-04-28 14:07:25 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
13
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#71,095,287
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
#2
updatePrices
#3
0xce1e7030
· blocks 1
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#7
updatePriceFeedsIfNecessary
#8
setData
#9
0x32366535
#6
0x6463ffd1
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3
w0
6
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xf3ba868e…f93a
0x065c9d…c394
3 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0001
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x065c9d28…a9c394
1 conflict on slot
0xf3ba868e42…2af93a
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity