pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#71,627,289
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #71,627,289
27 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-05-01 01:14:23 UTC
Parallelism
70
/100
Blocked
50
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.07
Longest chain
8
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#71,627,289
· 27 txs across 8 waves · depth 8
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#3
0x0c7abd22
#8
0xcf7468f4
#9
0xcf7468f4
#10
0x719d975a
#11
0xe0de3ed7
#12
0xe0de3ed7
#13
0x0d04188d
#14
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#15
0x5bf9264c
#16
0x5bf9264c
#17
0x5bf9264c
#18
0x5bf9264c
#19
0xeffdedb0
#22
account_info_rotate_tine
#23
setData
#24
execute
#25
0x69f3fee6
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#7
execute_route
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#20
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#21
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#26
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
4
w2
5
w3
6
w4
7
w3
20
w5
21
w6
26
w7
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x629a4008…e3ed
0xd32edf…ff58
15 touches
28 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xf8480e2a…dff1
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x5b857d8d…7157
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0xd32edf66…9fff58
28 conflicts on slot
0x629a400872…3ce3ed
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity