pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#71,696,872
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #71,696,872
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-05-01 08:57:35 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
13
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#71,696,872
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xcf7468f4
#2
0x9036287a
· blocks 1
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#4
0xeffdedb0
#5
artefact_keep
#6
0x0c7abd22
#7
setData
#9
0x69f46b77
#8
0x3f5c179b
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
8
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7503becd…afcb
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x4ac09c91…3cd8
0x065c9d…c394
3 touches
1 conflict
0xc4bfa113…ed6f
0x065c9d…c394
3 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0001
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x41755291…977f
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x065c9d28…a9c394
1 conflict on slot
0x0000000000…00003d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity