pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#71,741,443
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #71,741,443
27 transactions · 21 stateful · 2026-05-01 13:54:21 UTC
Parallelism
81
/100
Blocked
48
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.74
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#71,741,443
· 27 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
addLiquidity
#2
updatePrices
· blocks 3
#5
updatePrices
#7
updatePrices
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#10
0x5bf9264c
#11
0x5bf9264c
#12
0xeffdedb0
#15
razor_balance
#16
razor_balance
#17
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#18
0x3f5c179b
· blocks 2
#22
0x69f4b104
#23
setData
#24
0x69f4b104
#25
0x39435dac
· blocks 1
#3
updatePrices
· blocks 2
#9
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#20
0xed82b078
· blocks 1
#26
0x39435dac
#4
updatePrices
· blocks 1
#13
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#21
0xed82b078
#6
updatePrices
#14
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#19
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
3
w1
4
w2
6
w3
8
w0
9
w1
13
w2
14
w3
18
w0
19
w4
20
w1
21
w2
25
w0
26
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe51372c9…523e
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0002
0x7e9d3a…9fda
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xffe431af…8faa
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb45d9d6…cb85
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1c354dc0…96de
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0xd32edf66…9fff58
10 conflicts on slot
0xe51372c9e1…fd523e
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity