pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
analytics
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#72,296,300
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #72,296,300
24 transactions · 18 stateful · 2026-05-04 03:36:19 UTC
Parallelism
67
/100
Blocked
50
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.42
Longest chain
8
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#72,296,300
· 24 txs across 8 waves · depth 8
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x4500f50f
· blocks 3
#3
0x1094dc9f
#4
0xcf7468f4
#5
requestRedeem
#6
0xe0de3ed7
#7
0xe0de3ed7
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#9
removeLiquidity
#12
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#17
updateTemporalNumericValuesV1
#18
setData
#19
exactInputSingle
#20
0x8b23406f
#21
0x39435dac
#2
0x42dd8743
· blocks 2
#10
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#11
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#14
0x3f5c179b
· blocks 1
#13
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#15
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#16
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#22
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#23
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
8
w0
10
w1
11
w2
13
w3
14
w2
15
w4
16
w5
22
w6
23
w7
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xa10d36a7…5577
0xd32edf…ff58
15 touches
28 conflicts
0xc3c8642a…7da5
0x2a68ba…90c5
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xbbee74c2…567a
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa1087a5c…66c4
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc394e7d5…6681
0x065c9d…c394
3 touches
1 conflict
0x9c059d10…b022
0x065c9d…c394
3 touches
1 conflict
0x74c01f97…9b77
0x065c9d…c394
3 touches
1 conflict
0xd5daadcc…c9b9
0x2a3755…a5a6
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0xd32edf66…9fff58
28 conflicts on slot
0xa10d36a76d…035577
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity