← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #72,500,570
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-05 02:17:03 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
22%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.2
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #72,500,570 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w17w08w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x0d0b2509…074d
0x3bd359…433a
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe6455d1f…1029
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
0xffe431af…8faa
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x33018431…8f5c
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x33018431…8f5e
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x4dd1db39…a994
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x4dd1db39…a996
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xf6cc7de8…0b4a
0x3bd359…433a
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Wrapped MON (WMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0d0b2509ae…4b074d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity