pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
analytics
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#73,333,844
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,333,844
21 transactions · 18 stateful · 2026-05-08 22:45:47 UTC
Parallelism
48
/100
Blocked
56
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.48
Longest chain
11
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#73,333,844
· 21 txs across 11 waves · depth 11
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
wave
w8
wave
w9
wave
w10
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xcf7468f4
#2
0x719d975a
· blocks 1
#3
0x9f209239
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#6
setData
#7
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#18
0x25bd1cf0
#19
0xeffdedb0
#20
0xf2eaccd1
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#9
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#10
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#11
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#12
0x5339c59f
· blocks 5
#13
0x5339c59f
· blocks 4
#14
0x5339c59f
· blocks 3
#15
0xed82b078
· blocks 2
#16
0xed82b078
· blocks 1
#17
0xed82b078
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
7
w0
8
w1
9
w2
10
w3
11
w4
12
w5
13
w6
14
w7
15
w8
16
w9
17
w10
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x046a928e…0012
0x2a68ba…90c5
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xf537eaa0…73c8
0x065c9d…c394
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x0bb78a68…f522
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb85
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x2a68ba18…8e90c5
15 conflicts on slot
0x046a928e85…e50012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity