pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
analytics
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#73,343,590
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,343,590
26 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-05-08 23:50:35 UTC
Parallelism
62
/100
Blocked
47
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.46
Longest chain
10
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#73,343,590
· 26 txs across 10 waves · depth 10
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
wave
w8
wave
w9
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 9
#9
execute_route
#10
0x719d975a
#11
0xe0de3ed7
#12
0x05ee6a22
#13
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#14
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#15
swap
#16
0x98717539
#18
createModule
#19
forward
#21
0x69fe7743
#22
0xeffdedb0
#23
setData
#24
0x8b23406f
#25
0x39435dac
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#7
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#17
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#20
0xed82b078
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w4
6
w5
7
w6
8
w7
17
w8
20
w9
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xbdb042d5…f1aa
0xd32edf…ff58
17 touches
36 conflicts
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x6f08361d…bda6
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0xd32edf66…9fff58
36 conflicts on slot
0xbdb042d5a3…f0f1aa
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity