pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
analytics
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#73,597,668
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,597,668
24 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-05-10 04:00:26 UTC
Parallelism
58
/100
Blocked
58
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.96
Longest chain
10
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#73,597,668
· 24 txs across 10 waves · depth 10
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
wave
w8
wave
w9
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 9
#10
execute
#11
0x6a000352
#12
0x05ee6a22
#13
updatePrices
· blocks 1
#16
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#17
0x5bf9264c
#18
0x98717539
· blocks 1
#19
artefact_keep
#20
0xc2d867a5
#21
setData
#23
0x0f052239
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 8
#14
updatePrices
#22
0x39435dac
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#7
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#9
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#15
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w4
6
w5
7
w6
8
w7
9
w8
15
w9
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x3c300097…e5d9
0xd32edf…ff58
19 touches
45 conflicts
0x485d2778…aa5c
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xf537eaa0…73c8
0x065c9d…c394
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0xd32edf66…9fff58
45 conflicts on slot
0x3c3000970d…4ee5d9
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity