← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,642,867
9 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-10 09:03:08 UTC
Parallelism
78/100
Blocked
22%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.22
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,642,867 · 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w05w06w17w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe89e1a22…ce49
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x22e295f5…1bef
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0520da1d…c88e
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa8bd52b5…862e
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc5564f8e…f4bf
0x6c4bfa…a540
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x414e6d08…fe12
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0xe89e1a2242…33ce49
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity