← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,688,542
8 transactions · 6 stateful · 2026-05-10 14:11:14 UTC
Parallelism
75/100
Blocked
17%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,688,542 · 8 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe89e1a22…ce49
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xb1632c2f…d991
0x0a3323…0a3c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xdeaab6a3…ccad
0x0a3323…0a3c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00012874…14f4
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2877f440…c2c8
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3e733ae4…4598
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1ab
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity