← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #75,471,144
8 transactions · 6 stateful · 2026-05-18 20:35:59 UTC
Parallelism
75/100
Blocked
17%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #75,471,144 · 8 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0335ae80…8414
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x17cd1479…00bb
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1aa
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x2e2e24ff…0d17
0x6f4756…dd5b
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xe1642c96…6c9c
0x8e60b7…286e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xd19c0cfd…b58f
0x9cab7e…689b
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1ab
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity