← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #76,677,070
13 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-24 10:38:57 UTC
Parallelism
85/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.08
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #76,677,070 · 13 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xbdcc6247…faf9
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0004
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x04cfa1c4…19b5
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a3
0x8d66a4…3095
3 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a1
0x8d66a4…3095
3 touches
1 conflict
0xc009105d…96f7
0x8d66a4…3095
3 touches
1 conflict
0xba5743c7…21bf
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0xbdcc6247ef…97faf9
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity