← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,023,787
15 transactions · 13 stateful · 2026-08-28 23:00:07 UTC
Parallelism
67/100
Blocked
31%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.33
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,023,787 · 15 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w06w17w28w311w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x9256b810…52ca
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x07da0a8b…965b
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity