← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,096,712
27 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-08-29 05:07:14 UTC
Parallelism
78/100
Blocked
32%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.52
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,096,712 · 27 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w315w420w421w5
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x3a3097d7…2ab6
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x0f1e859d…eca4
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x348fda08…7e96
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity