← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,110,015
22 transactions · 18 stateful · 2026-08-29 06:14:13 UTC
Parallelism
77/100
Blocked
39%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.59
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,110,015 · 22 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w06w110w111w212w313w415w019w121w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xe01158fd…f981
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x531182ec…755c
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000013
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity