pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#100,131,997
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,131,997
32 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-08-29 08:04:54 UTC
Parallelism
91
/100
Blocked
14
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.06
Longest chain
3
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#100,131,997
· 32 txs across 3 waves · depth 3
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xe3c6fc…33a0
#2
0x7d6910…ded4
#3
0xf148c7…8bb4
#4
0xb1146f…940d
#5
0xeb7a2a…a866
#6
0x0e6641…7251
#7
0xc86655…18eb
#8
0xbe5a1a…8949
#9
0x2a47b2…9322
#10
0xd9898a…77fd
#11
0x7b8271…1780
#12
0xc32671…884b
#13
0xe9af64…9974
#14
0x0b0bd0…1134
#15
0x69ada8…e114
#16
0x8d9578…3839
#17
0xcaf572…5d47
#18
0xab083028
#19
0xab083028
#20
execOrders
· blocks 1
#21
0x5acec890
#24
0x5acec890
#25
0x59558d29
#26
0x59558d29
#27
execPerpOps
#28
0x94defb17
#29
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#30
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#31
execOrders
#22
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#23
0x5acec890
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
20
w0
22
w1
23
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x676f9f01…a8ac
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x889d5e90…929a
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x01e9f543…cb82
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x30c10c87…22ec
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x310a7246…2dcb
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xca841faae5…71486a
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity