← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,138,618
16 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-08-29 08:38:22 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
25%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.25
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,138,618 · 16 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w03w04w15w17w012w013w115w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd5c98027…9fd9
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xfe39a1f7…8eb0
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x889d5e90…929a
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x37b6ab99…7682
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x676f9f01…a8ac
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0002
0xf5b5f7…6d70
4 touches
1 conflict
0xafebd6c0…3617
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xfcb7b8b2…ebb3
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl
1 conflict on slot 0xd5c98027d8…499fd9
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity