pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#100,140,732
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,140,732
23 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-08-29 08:49:01 UTC
Parallelism
65
/100
Blocked
52
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.17
Longest chain
8
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#100,140,732
· 23 txs across 8 waves · depth 8
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#4
updatePrices
#5
execOrders
#7
0x59558d29
#8
0xb414539a
· blocks 1
#9
execOrders
· blocks 1
#11
setData
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#15
0x3f5c179b
#16
0xed82b078
· blocks 1
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#13
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#17
0xed82b078
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#6
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#10
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#18
execOrders
· blocks 4
#14
0x0c7abd22
#19
execOrders
· blocks 3
#20
execOrders
· blocks 2
#21
execOrders
· blocks 1
#22
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
6
w2
8
w0
9
w0
10
w3
13
w1
14
w4
16
w0
17
w1
18
w3
19
w4
20
w5
21
w6
22
w7
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x37a2c627…8758
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x6b1259e6…4e12
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x15698ac9…2a46
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
10 conflicts on slot
0xd98b3c102b…ca67b8
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity