← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,161,395
118 transactions · 117 stateful · 2026-08-29 10:33:03 UTC
Parallelism
96/100
Blocked
5%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,161,395 · 118 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w4113w0114w1115w0117w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x48a29a03…c43b
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x78b913f7…695c
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity