← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,249,917
15 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-08-29 17:59:23 UTC
Parallelism
60/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.6
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,249,917 · 15 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w25w18w29w310w414w5
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x784d7a94…94a2
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x5b1375e0…c01d
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00001f
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity