← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,590,165
18 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-08-30 22:34:12 UTC
Parallelism
72/100
Blocked
31%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.39
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,590,165 · 18 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3w04w15w16w210w016w317w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x261261a7…6174
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x18e0a398…8bf5
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity