← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,620,151
39 transactions · 36 stateful · 2026-08-31 01:05:03 UTC
Parallelism
87/100
Blocked
22%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.36
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,620,151 · 39 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w38w09w133w334w035w136w138w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x73912233…4589
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x15eb2d47…a141
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity