← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,738,553
18 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-08-31 11:00:39 UTC
Parallelism
72/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.61
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,738,553 · 18 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w25w37w18w110w011w112w213w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0029
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xa1087a5c…66c4
0x754704…b603
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x11b69a7e…334e
0x01bff4…1071
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x2b093939…9084
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000029
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity