← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #100,809,772
28 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-08-31 16:59:07 UTC
Parallelism
86/100
Blocked
37%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.43
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #100,809,772 · 28 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w15w28w310w013w014w015w118w222w326w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xba5743c7…21c2
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xc3a6441a…e78a
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity