← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,016,901
17 transactions · 15 stateful · 2026-09-01 10:21:18 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
20%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.18
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,016,901 · 17 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w110w011w116w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x57070322…bc66
0xe52b14…7230
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf275b4ca…57b8
0xe52b14…7230
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf79df061…e005
0xe52b14…7230
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000013
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity