← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,021,914
15 transactions · 15 stateful · 2026-09-01 10:46:31 UTC
Parallelism
87/100
Blocked
20%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.2
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,021,914 · 15 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w14w08w111w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0xa6afd3…d132
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb45d9d6…cb87
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0cde810b…bbd8
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0xbde524f4…43bf
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0xd9f18d9a4a…7f141d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity