pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,061,699
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,061,699
25 transactions · 24 stateful · 2026-09-01 14:06:41 UTC
Parallelism
72
/100
Blocked
54
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.04
Longest chain
7
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,061,699
· 25 txs across 7 waves · depth 7
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#4
0xab083028
· blocks 3
#6
updatePrices
#7
execOrders
#9
0x5acec890
#14
0x94defb17
#16
forward
#17
0xed82b078
#18
transfer
· blocks 1
#20
0x6a96dc69
#21
setData
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#5
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#12
0x3f5c179b
· blocks 1
#19
transfer
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#8
0x5acec890
· blocks 4
#13
0x3f5c179b
#22
0xc7068c7b
#10
0x0c7abd22
#11
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#15
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#23
execOrders
· blocks 1
#24
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w0
5
w1
8
w2
10
w3
11
w3
12
w1
13
w2
15
w4
18
w0
19
w1
22
w2
23
w5
24
w6
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x78694995…f667
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
10 conflicts on slot
0xc824469a90…af6425
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity