← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,064,098
25 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-09-01 14:18:47 UTC
Parallelism
84/100
Blocked
37%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.44
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,064,098 · 25 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w04w05w112w113w214w315w017w120w021w122w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xb1526c23…f2b4
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x64e34a61…559f
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity