← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,066,929
26 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-09-01 14:33:07 UTC
Parallelism
81/100
Blocked
44%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.31
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,066,929 · 26 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w03w17w213w014w117w018w121w323w125w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xba5743c7…21bf
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x7388a8bb…9cd3
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000028
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity