← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,096,508
30 transactions · 26 stateful · 2026-09-01 17:02:08 UTC
Parallelism
93/100
Blocked
23%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.23
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,096,508 · 30 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w14w15w06w116w018w123w124w025w026w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xea2d3331…6e31
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity