← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,149,733
25 transactions · 22 stateful · 2026-09-01 21:29:53 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
41%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.4
Longest chain
3 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,149,733 · 25 txs across 3 waves · depth 3
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w03w14w26w07w18w113w015w016w119w120w021w122w124w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0029
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xf2e7bb96…1a54
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0019
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x860dfc26…8393
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000029
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity