← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,250,580
25 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-09-02 05:57:12 UTC
Parallelism
84/100
Blocked
43%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.6
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,250,580 · 25 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w04w18w09w111w212w315w016w217w118w319w224w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0002
0xf5b5f7…6d70
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x5ce08c09…7f3e
0xa6afd3…d132
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0xa6afd3…d132
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xba5743c7…21c2
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: 0xf5b5f7f8…a36d70
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000002
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity