← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,300,988
32 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-09-02 10:10:50 UTC
Parallelism
84/100
Blocked
30%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.38
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,300,988 · 32 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w28w09w010w113w324w026w127w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x502b3ee1…7f7c
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…002c
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0xd9f18d9a4a…7f141d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity