pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,303,587
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,303,587
26 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-09-02 10:23:54 UTC
Parallelism
85
/100
Blocked
20
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.27
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,303,587
· 26 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#2
execOrder
#3
execOrder
#4
0xab083028
#5
0xab083028
#6
0x8263f5d9
#7
execOrders
#8
0x5acec890
#10
0x5acec890
#11
0x5acec890
#14
0x5acec890
#15
0x5acec890
#16
0x3e2e8792
#17
0x5acec890
#18
0x59558d29
#19
execPerpOps
#20
setData
#21
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#22
0x3f5c179b
#23
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#24
0x6a97f9b2
#9
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#25
execOrders
#12
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#13
0x5acec890
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
9
w1
12
w2
13
w3
25
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x51fc8795…126f
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x80c734ec…3dc3
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…002c
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
6 conflicts on slot
0xca841faae5…71486a
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity