pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,304,115
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,304,115
24 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-09-02 10:26:34 UTC
Parallelism
63
/100
Blocked
45
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.04
Longest chain
9
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,304,115
· 24 txs across 9 waves · depth 9
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
wave
w8
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#5
0xdb834625
#6
execOrder
#7
execOrder
#8
execOrder
#10
0xab083028
#11
execOrders
#12
execOrder
· blocks 1
#13
0x59558d29
#14
execPerpOps
#15
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#18
0x3f5c179b
#20
transfer
#21
setData
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 3
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#9
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#17
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#19
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#22
execOrders
· blocks 1
#23
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
9
w4
12
w0
16
w2
17
w5
19
w6
22
w7
23
w8
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x482471ad…122f
0x34b655…2a6f
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002c
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd8d828a7…b64c
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
10 conflicts on slot
0x482471adbb…39122f
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity