pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,307,326
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,307,326
21 transactions · 18 stateful · 2026-09-02 10:42:44 UTC
Parallelism
81
/100
Blocked
39
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.67
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,307,326
· 21 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#2
0x0c7abd22
#6
matchOrders
#7
execOrders
· blocks 1
#8
updatePrices
#9
0x3e2e8792
#12
0x6a97fe1b
#13
0x59558d29
#14
execOrders
#15
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#19
setData
#20
execOrders
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#10
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#11
0x5acec890
#17
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#5
0x0c7abd22
#18
execFwdPositionOpsV2
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
3
w1
4
w2
5
w3
7
w0
10
w1
11
w2
16
w0
17
w2
18
w3
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x6fd9ae7c…e982
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xfe3f9303…04fa
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…00002d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity