← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,307,812
19 transactions · 18 stateful · 2026-09-02 10:45:10 UTC
Parallelism
68/100
Blocked
44%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.05
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,307,812 · 19 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w46w513w014w116w017w118w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xf58eca50…59fb
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xcdd46542…4af8
0xd32edf…ff58
11 touches
15 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
15 conflicts on slot 0xf58eca505b…9a59fb
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity