pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,309,315
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,309,315
27 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-09-02 10:52:44 UTC
Parallelism
85
/100
Blocked
35
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.48
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,309,315
· 27 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#6
execOrders
· blocks 1
#8
updatePrices
#9
0x5acec890
#10
0x5acec890
#11
0x5acec890
#12
0x5acec890
#13
execOrder
#14
execOrder
#15
0x59558d29
#16
0x45b7e41f
#17
transferWithAuthorization
· blocks 1
#19
setData
#20
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#22
0x3f5c179b
#23
updatePosition
#24
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#25
execOrders
· blocks 1
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#7
execOrders
#18
transferWithAuthorization
#21
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#5
0xab083028
#26
execOrders
#4
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w2
6
w0
7
w1
17
w0
18
w1
21
w1
25
w0
26
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x1045386d…cb8b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x4f6c70cb…325e
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x1045386d70…6ccb8b
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity