← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,311,019
20 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-09-02 11:01:19 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
29%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.4
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,311,019 · 20 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3w04w16w07w18w29w317w018w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0002
0xf5b5f7…6d70
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0xabde8104…c9a9
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x10abefc9…c9bc
0x34ae4d…3fc5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x10d80fee…dbda
0x34ae4d…3fc5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x40970e69…da50
0x34ae4d…3fc5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x7aa91b8f…d070
0x34ae4d…3fc5
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: 0xf5b5f7f8…a36d70
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000002
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity