← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,321,363
30 transactions · 28 stateful · 2026-09-02 11:53:21 UTC
Parallelism
87/100
Blocked
29%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.4
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,321,363 · 30 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w05w06w09w110w211w313w015w116w118w119w229w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xe483d4e3…e530
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x2dcdf81b…c6c8
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00001d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity