← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,325,912
26 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-09-02 12:16:14 UTC
Parallelism
81/100
Blocked
53%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.5
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,325,912 · 26 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3w05w16w210w312w413w214w015w116w018w120w122w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0002
0xf5b5f7…6d70
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x7fd3db9d…12db
0xa6afd3…d132
4 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe937b6bc…8a59
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: 0xf5b5f7f8…a36d70
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000002
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity