pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,660,080
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,660,080
9 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-09-03 16:17:33 UTC
Parallelism
78
/100
Blocked
11
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,660,080
· 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrders
#2
updatePrices
· blocks 1
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
0x59558d29
#6
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#7
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#8
0x6a999e15
#3
updatePrices
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
3
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0002
0xf5b5f7…6d70
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x02e1003a…a86c
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0de7749d…5bef
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0ed7cc0b…ee52
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x215160c9…7266
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x34da30c5…2593
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0xf5b5f7f8…a36d70
1 conflict on slot
0x0000000000…000002
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity