pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,798,177
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,798,177
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-09-04 03:52:09 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,798,177
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x5acec890
#2
0x5acec890
#3
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#4
0x59558d29
#5
setData
#6
updatePriceFeedsIfNecessary
#7
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#9
0x6a9a40e1
#8
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3
w0
8
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0259de4d…a4dd
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09aff580…d5a1
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2d94ecd9…43db
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3f875ce8…7e0f
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xca841faae5…71486a
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity