pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,799,409
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,799,409
25 transactions · 12 stateful · 2026-09-04 03:58:21 UTC
Parallelism
92
/100
Blocked
17
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.08
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,799,409
· 25 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
#2
0x0c7abd22
#3
0x0c7abd22
#4
0x0c7abd22
#5
0x6a9a4255
· blocks 1
#7
0x6a9a4255
#8
updatePrices
· blocks 1
#9
updatePrices
#11
updatePrices
#12
updatePrices
#13
updatePrices
#14
updatePrices
#15
0x5acec890
#16
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#17
0x59558d29
#18
execPerpOps
#19
execPerpOps
#20
executeBatch
#21
setData
#22
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#23
execOrders
#24
execOrders
#6
0x6a9a4255
#10
updatePrices
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
5
w0
6
w1
8
w0
10
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x0d622e34…0000
0x681e90…ae09
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0002
0xf5b5f7…6d70
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x681e908b…e1ae09
1 conflict on slot
0x0d622e34f9…000000
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity