pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,992,775
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,992,775
30 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-09-04 20:15:19 UTC
Parallelism
93
/100
Blocked
22
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.07
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,992,775
· 30 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#2
0x22686f…ea57
#3
0xa971ae…a834
#4
0x54c5f5…774b
#5
0x4aa162…7271
#6
0x6ca773…d6eb
#7
0xec65ba…7061
#8
0x79e109…92a6
#9
0xbe398f…6b07
#10
0xe623c6…19e1
#11
0x983784…c1b9
#12
0xddd10b…0d67
#13
0xc67eb4…b13c
#14
0x0be7a9…8f85
#15
0x0054a5…f667
#16
0xc62ad2…a109
#17
0x1d6c4e…a69f
#18
0x984c0a…71ab
#19
0xa050b1…f85e
#20
0xe98301…08f1
#21
0x05b2d4…1023
#22
execOrders
· blocks 1
#24
0xab083028
#25
0x59558d29
#26
multiSend
#28
setData
#29
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#23
execOrders
#27
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
22
w0
23
w1
27
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd53220ed…4736
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x04d4f30d…4dfb
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot
0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity