pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#101,992,897
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,992,897
32 transactions · 11 stateful · 2026-09-04 20:15:57 UTC
Parallelism
94
/100
Blocked
9
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.03
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#101,992,897
· 32 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xa96df62f
#2
0x1ca5ef…79e1
#3
0x5eb511…3a7a
#4
0x06bfbc…88b0
#5
0xd9c6f1…4cf3
#6
0xac8657…4cf0
#7
0x90fd50…ac11
#8
0xe2718c…e135
#9
0x0894ff…41ff
#10
0x3400bd…b603
#11
0x71adad…cbd6
#12
0xba8e00…5070
#13
0x751936…867c
#14
0xce0fde…7873
#15
0x611bc2…1d54
#16
0x10ed23…cf34
#17
0x2dad94…f201
#18
0x4d948b…b8a8
#19
0xaac62b…0823
#20
0x151cfd…5b74
#21
0xf30e99…a3ec
#22
execOrders
#23
0xab083028
#24
0xab083028
#25
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#26
0x59558d29
#27
setData
#28
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#30
0x6a9b2775
#31
execOrders
#29
execFwdPositionOpsV2
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
28
w0
29
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x482471ad…122f
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x045532dd…4b7d
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x04d4f30d…4dfb
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x07a85c83…5571
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2945f0c7…8d00
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3167d7d8…a06b
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3713e989…4b42
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xc824469a90…af6425
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity