← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #101,993,700
27 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-09-04 20:20:01 UTC
Parallelism
81/100
Blocked
35%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.59
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #101,993,700 · 27 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w14w25w36w414w421w023w024w125w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xba5743c7…21c1
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x24a272aa…efe6
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity